15 Soil Moisture Products: Microwaves vs. Cosmic Rays


Comprehensive quality assessment of satellite- and model-based soil moisture products against the COSMOS network in Germany — Schmidt T, Schrön M, Li Z, Francke T, Zacharias S, Hildebrandt A, and Peng J (Remote Sensing of Environment, 2024)

Bias and uncertainty estimations of non-transformed, filtered, and deseasonalized time series over the time from 2015–2020 for all products and 21 COSMOS-Europe field sites. Numerical mean values are given for non-transformed time series only.

Abstract

Critical to the reliable application of gridded soil moisture products is a thorough assessment of their quality at spatially compatible scales. While previous studies have attempted to evaluate different soil moisture products, comprehensive assessments at the appropriate scale remain challenging and rare. This study explores the po- tential of the Cosmic-Ray Soil Moisture Observation System (COSMOS) in Germany for effectively mitigating the scale mismatch between soil moisture products and reference measurements. A newly released extensive COSMOS data set provides time series of hectare-scale soil moisture of the main root zone at different locations in Germany and offers a unique opportunity for a comprehensive quality assessment of 15 commonly-used coarse- scale soil moisture products. Those are either satellite-based (AMSR2 LPRM, ASCAT H115/H116, Sentinel-1 SSM, SMAP L3E, SMOS L3, ASCAT/Sentinel-1 SWI, SMAP/Sentinel-1 L2, CCI Combined, and NOAA SMOPS) or model- based (ERA5-Land, GLDAS-Noah, ASCAT H141/H142, GLEAM, SMAP L4, and SMOS L4). We compared the temporal dynamics of the soil moisture products against that of the COSMOS soil moisture estimates at 21 sites of different land cover types over six years (2015–2020), including the drought of 2018. We found that the model- based products generally yield a higher correlation (0.74) and lower unbiased root-mean-square differences (0.05 m3 m− 3) than the satellite-based products (0.60 and 0.07 m3 m− 3, respectively) against the COSMOS data in Germany. Notably, the application of the exponential filter significantly improves the performance of the products. Conversely, deseasonalized time series of all selected products demonstrate lower performances across all COSMOS sites. Most products show a considerable positive bias, which limits their usability for the assessment of absolute soil water storage. We also found that the land cover type, mean annual soil moisture, and vertical support have notable influences on the performance of the soil moisture products. Additionally, the performances of the soil moisture products show seasonal variations, such that both correlation and bias are highest during the summer season. This study highlights the strengths of COSMOS data as a robust reference for evaluating soil moisture products. Additionally, it provides insights on how to assess, interpret, and improve large-scale soil moisture products.

Methodological study design flowchart. For the static intercomparison, intercomparison metrics were calculated for full time series, whereas for the dynamic intercomparison for a 61-days moving window.

Reference

Schmidt T, Schrön M, Li Z, Francke T, Zacharias S, Hildebrandt A, and Peng J: Comprehensive quality assessment of satellite- and model-based soil moisture products against the COSMOS network in Germany. Remote Sensing of Environment, 301, 113930, 10.1016/j.rse.2023.113930, 2024.

Share



Follow this website


You need to create an Owlstown account to follow this website.


Sign up

Already an Owlstown member?

Log in